Is the Palm/Apple iTunes spat finished?

Robert Hallock (Thrax)

September 23, 2009 12:14 PM ET in News, , , , , , ,

palmlogoIt has been a hard-fought battle between Palm, which has used dirty tricks to get their Pre syncing with iTunes, and Apple who wouldn’t stand for it. The battle appears to be over, however, as the USB Implementers Forum has settled the dispute in favor of Apple.

The USB Implementers Forum, or USB-IF, is the overseer of all things USB. The non-profit organization is responsible for promoting the tech, as well as assigning the vendor IDs which allow USB devices to function.

Palm had previously alleged that Apple was improperly filtering non-Apple USB vendor IDs from syncing with iTunes, thereby blocking the company’s Pre smartphone. The USB-IF has disagreed with that claim, saying “[in] the view of the USB-IF, Palm’s allegation (if true) does not establish that Apple is using its Vendor ID (VID) contrary to the USB-IF’s policies,” the group said. “Therefore, under present USB-IF policies, the USB-IF does not consider the alleged use, without more, to be ‘improper.’”

The group went on to say that Palm may even be violating its member agreement which states that a device may only ever report one VID. In syncing the Pre with iTunes, Palm switches out the phone’s natural ID in favor of an Apple one which iTunes cannot filter.

The ruling leaves future iTunes sync support on the Palm Pre in jeopardy. It is not immediately clear if Palm can appeal the decision, or work within it to continue offering iTunes support.

Share |

10 Comments:

  1. Palm should first understand that this spat does not help their image. They give the impression of an iPhone knock-off by piggybacking iTunes and fighting for it in public.

  2. I think you'll find that many people are rooting for Palm in this circumstance.

  3. I own an iPhone and I'm rooting for Palm.

    The closed ecosystem can-only-use-itunes-with-apple policy is bullshit.

  4. jared hit that nail right on the head.

  5. Anticompetitive, anticonsumer, and anti-open. It's everything I hate about Apple.

  6. I don't have a smart phone and it would not be iPhone if I were buying one due to same reason Jared stated. Palm's spat is amusing and I root for them, but I am also afraid it will hurt them eventually.

  7. Last I heard, Apple disabled Palm sync again with iTunes 9.

  8. Personally, that was one of the reasons why I bought the Pre. Not because it syncs with iTunes, which I really don't care about. The fact that they took the fight to Apple publicly made me want to support them monetarily. When this fight is over, whether Palm wins or loses the battle, we all will win the war. The reason why I say that is because it seems to me that Palm's methods for syncing with iTunes are less than ethical. Eventually, the courts are probably going to rule against Apple, and phone/mp3 player manufacturers will be able to sync with iTunes, but will probably have to pay licensing fees.

    In the meantime, I'm going to continue to use iTunes 8.2.1.6 until Palm hAx0rs my phone again to support iTunes 9. I'm not really that big of a fan of iTunes, but I like to tell all my smug iPhone using friends about it.

  9. Plus I got a really kick-ass phone in the process.

  10. You guys know how much I love my iPhone and many other Apple products but their policies and corporate culture are infuriating. Jared nailed it, this policy is bullshit.

    I'm not sure I really think Palm should have won this because of the way they were getting around the blocking but Apple should never have blocked their devices in the first place.

Troll-free since 2003 ®