Mainstream XP and Office 2003 support retired

Robert Hallock (Thrax)

April 15, 2009 1:22 PM ET in News, , , , ,

windows-logoThe deadline has come and gone, and Microsoft has let Windows XP and all versions of Office 2003 slip from their mainstream support.

Phone assistance for these product families will now be offered on a per-hour or per-incident basis, while non-security critical fixes are no longer in the pipeline for users who did not register for Microsoft’s Extended Hotfix Support program in February.

Microsoft will continue to offer critical security fixes for these products August 4, 2014, but you’ll be upgrading to Windows 7 anyhow, right? RIGHT?

17 Comments:

  1. Right. Win 7 is where it's at.

  2. Right. Win 7 is where it's at.

    While I feel that XP is still useful I do agree that Win 7 is the new standard on the block.

    But I absolutely HATE Office 2007!

  3. I am getting used to office 2007; I don't hate it though. I do actually like some parts of it, but I must admit though it is S L O W on an older machine.

  4. *Shrug* I like 2007.

  5. Office 2007 has been on my Pc for over a year so I am comfortable now.

  6. I'm still bitter about the Ribbon UI not being optional, and the new file formats existing at all.

  7. .docx is the bane of my existence.

  8. .docx is my only complaint, too. The ribbon is so much better than the old standard menu system - take the time to use it and it'll pay dividends.

  9. .docx sucks -- you can make .doc default but for 'Non-technical' people, it's a friggin nightmare!

  10. .docx is my only complaint, too. The ribbon is so much better than the old standard menu system - take the time to use it and it'll pay dividends.

    I've been using it and still don't like it. But my biggest complaint is the amount of room it takes up on a notebook screen. I don't understand why people are designing things with horizontal bars when everyone is moving to wide screens. Or why they increased the amount of real estate the humble menu bar takes up at all, regardless of orientation.

  11. I've been using it and still don't like it. But my biggest complaint is the amount of room it takes up on a notebook screen. I don't understand why people are designing things with horizontal bars when everyone is moving to wide screens. Or why they increased the amount of real estate the humble menu bar takes up at all, regardless of orientation.

    You can minimize the ribbon by double-clicking one of the headers, that should free up a bit more space.

  12. You can minimize the ribbon by double-clicking one of the headers, that should free up a bit more space.

    Yep... what she said.

  13. You can minimize the ribbon by double-clicking one of the headers, that should free up a bit more space.

    Yeah, I'm doing that because the space is precious, but it's still annoying since this compromise doesn't simply make the Ribbon smaller, it hides the controls from my screen. The old system gave me all my commonly-used controls from all of the categories on one bar.

  14. You can put all of your commonly-used controls onto the Quick Access Toolbar, place the toolbar under the minimized ribbon, and now using Office 2007 is just as fast (if not faster) than using Office 2003. That's what I've done, at least.

  15. You can put all of your commonly-used controls onto the Quick Access Toolbar, place the toolbar under the minimized ribbon, and now using Office 2007 is just as fast (if not faster) than using Office 2003. That's what I've done, at least.

    Awesome, thanks both of you!

    Now I just need to get our admins to get persistent profiles in our computer lab or install UBitMenu. I'll definitely do one of these for my home desktop, though.

Troll-free since 2003 ®